21st CENTURY MOMS

You Too Can Telecommute.

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Electric technologies to drive GM

November 29, 2006

Electric technologies to drive GM

Wagoner will stress future of plug-in hybrids during speech today at Los Angeles Auto Show.

David Shepardson / Detroit News Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON -- General Motors Corp. today will tout its commitment to using advanced technologies to power vehicles with electricity and its research into plug-in hybrids -- a cornerstone of its turnaround plan.

In a speech at the Los Angeles Auto Show, GM Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner will outline a product plan based on "energy diversity" using a variety of advanced technologies and fuels that emphasizes the use of electricity to power vehicles.

Wagoner also will talk about plans to use an advanced two-mode hybrid system on some larger 2008 model vehicles.

The two-mode hybrid -- which GM, BMW and DaimlerChrysler AG will jointly produce -- will have an extended driving range on battery power and feature a gasoline or diesel engine that powers the car when the battery is low.

Ultimately, the two-mode hybrids could be converted to plug-in hybrids with advances in battery technology, GM officials said.

In his 25-minute speech, Wagoner will talk up the company's belief in the promise of plug-in hybrids and will reference an upcoming announcement at the Detroit auto show, officials told The News.

Next month, GM is expected to show off a concept plug-in hybrid -- dubbed the I-car within the company, or iconic vehicle.

Wagoner won't commit to building a plug-in until the company can overcome technical hurdles and improve battery technology. He will say production timing is specifically linked to technical improvements, according to people familiar with his speech. But GM officials believe the hurdles are "surmountable."

GM has quietly been making significant investments in battery technology, working with its suppliers and battery manufacturers.

"We're trying to make a statement that says we are part of the solution," to oil woes and environmental concerns, Troy Clarke, GM's president for North America, said Tuesday night at a GM media event where golfer Tiger Woods helped the automaker unveil the Buick Enclave crossover. "We have the right technology and we know what customers want."

GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz, head of product development, said this month it will take three to four years "to convert from 'power' lithium batteries to 'energy storage' lithium cells," which would allow vehicles to travel farther distances.

GM is "studying plug-in hybrids, and will have more to say about those soon. The whole key there is the development of significantly improved battery technology," Lutz said on a company Web blog in September. "But rest assured I truly believe that electric-drive vehicles have a real future"

Wagoner's speech today will emphasize the challenges the industry faces and note that no one could have predicted where the industry was headed in 2001. He will note the national security implications of not moving to eliminate U.S. dependence on foreign oil.

Ultimately, GM sees hydrogen fuel cells as the likely solution to ending the country's reliance on oil. GM believes the key is in using electricity -- through hybrids, batteries and fuel cells.

GM has made strides in hydrogen technology. It hopes to have 1,000 hydrogen vehicles on the roads by 2010, including 100 Chevy Equinox fuel cell SUVs next year. Its most advanced hydrogen vehicle, the concept Chevy Sequel, can travel 300 miles before refueling.

Plug-in hybrids are gas-electric vehicles that can recharge their batteries with an extension cord and a normal wall outlet.

Like conventional gas-electric hybrids, which have two drivetrains, a plug-in hybrid also can recharge its batteries through a regenerative brake system while on the road. The range on plug-in cars has typically been no more than 20 or 30 miles on battery alone.

But most vehicle trips are under 30 miles, which would remove the need to use any fuel in many trips.

Bruce Belzowski, assistant research scientist at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, said the jury is still out on what technology will win out in the years to come.

"People are placing bets across the range," Belzowski said. "There are no sure winners."

Sunday, November 26, 2006

GO TO GUY.

Thank God for Derrick Kuzak."

It's a popular refrain among the upper crust at Ford Motor Co. -- top guys such as Bill Ford, the company's chairman, and Mark Fields, president of the Americas.

New Ford CEO Alan Mulally made clear during a recent Free Press interview that he has become a fan, extolling Kuzak's "big-time leadership."

"I've really enjoyed getting to know him. He's kind of like doing the job like I did it at Boeing," Mulally said. "He understands. ... He understands. ... He understands."

So just who is this Derrick Kuzak?

Before anything, he's a metro Detroiter, born and raised in the city now known as Eastpointe.

Since last summer, he's also been head of product development at Ford. In his role, he's the head engineer, the steward of the company's product plans and in charge of the critical task of bringing more new vehicles to showrooms faster.

When it comes down to it, Kuzak's also the guy in charge of driving innovation, such as capless fuel filling points, which eventually will eliminate gas caps on Ford vehicles.

In essence, Kuzak might very well be the most crucial character behind the scenes in Ford's do-or-die turnaround. The Way Forward plan will cut 44,000 jobs and close 16 plants by 2012, but it also aims to replace or refresh 70% of the product lineup for Ford, Mercury and Lincoln by 2008.

"If we don't get things right there, it's very hard to make things right otherwise," Don Leclair, Ford's chief financial officer, said of the importance of product development.

Despite all his high-stakes responsibility, Kuzak hasn't made the big, public splash that Bob Lutz made when he became product czar over at rival General Motors Corp.

"I'm not very comfortable with drum rolls," Kuzak said in an interview with the Free Press. "Developing and bringing a vehicle to market is the height of collaboration. It is not done by one person. And it never really has the stamp of one person on it."

But starting Monday, Kuzak might begin taking more of the spotlight. Along with other top Ford executives, Kuzak will be hosting the company's Showroom of the Future events at Cobo Center, where tens of thousands of employees, retirees and guests will get a confidential preview of Ford vehicles through model year 2010.

Those who don't know Kuzak will meet an executive who is soft-spoken, modest and collected.

Despite being in the eye of Ford's latest storm -- the automaker has lost $7 billion this year, sales are down 7.4% through October and he's the third product chief in three years -- Kuzak somehow maintains the calm, professional manner of a butler.

During an hour-long interview at his office in Ford's product development center, Kuzak talked about his no-more-excuses vision for future Ford vehicles, his love of engineering and the two principles that guide his strategy: consumers and, well, fear.
"Are we thinking about our customer?" Kuzak asked. "The ability to look outside of the walls of Detroit, outside of the walls of Ford, and every day, every moment, consider who is going to buy these vehicles. ... How can we make it better for them?"

But Ford can't worry about consumers' needs in a vacuum, he said. It has to fear the competition.

"Are we paranoid enough about our competition?" he asked. "I've got a ... saying: Only the paranoid survive."

Kuzak's plan for the future is a pie chart divided in thirds: one part cars, one part crossovers and SUVs, and one part trucks.

Based on Ford's sales last year, that would translate into an 8% decline in pickups and minivans and a 7% gain in the grouping of crossovers and SUVs, with crossovers making up even more of the sales as vehicles like the Explorer continue declining in popularity.

Special emphasis will go on the namesake Ford brand, which Kuzak wants to strengthen worldwide, and he said all future Ford, Mercury and Lincoln vehicles will match or beat the competition in areas critical to consumers.

In his words, those vehicles will be "fully competitive," and Ford isn't going to give customers any more reasons to opt-out of Ford's brands in the future.

"It's very simple for me," he said. "As competitive as the marketplace is today, there are certain elements of a vehicle that customers ... look at very carefully. They surround fuel economy, the safety features on a vehicle and the feature content. And one step that you want to ensure is that there is never any reason, in the fundamentals of the vehicle, that the customer will not consider a Ford vehicle.

"And then on top of that you add the emotion, through design, the emotion, through exciting interiors; you have some unique features that the competition doesn't have."

Kuzak boasts that Ford has some game-changing innovation up its sleeve, and he's excited that many employees, retirees and customers will get to see it soon.

"I think people are going to be very, very pleasantly surprised when they see what's coming on Focus next year," he said.

The men and women who work most closely with Kuzak have little doubt he will succeed in getting Ford's product stable full of the cars and trucks that customers want, and soon.

They confess to loving him for speaking their automotive language, be it engineering, marketing or design. They call him the best-prepared person in any meeting. Many said they felt somewhat at ease at this turbulent time, knowing Kuzak is in charge.

Kuzak, for his part, seems to love the challenge of his job.

"When you're doing cars and trucks, the technology is immensely complex, but you're doing a product that customers love," he said.

"They have an emotional attachment to their car or their truck, so there's enormous gratification from that. And the challenge of having to do it in high volumes and at affordable prices makes it the most challenging engineering job there is."

At a time of great change and struggles in the Motor City, Kuzak said he couldn't be more motivated to succeed.

"My grandfathers worked in the automotive factories. One of my uncles was a lead negotiator for the union contract, so I've got a lot of family history," he said. "It is important almost from a national perspective for many of us, to ensure that we make this work. It does get that personal."

Contact SARAH A. WEBSTER at 313-222-5394 or swebster@freepress.com.

Copyright © 2006 Detroit Free Press Inc.

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Ford plant empowers employees

Focus on line workers' suggestions boosts quality, reliability at Kansas City factory

By Eric Mayne / The Detroit News

KANSAS CITY, Kan. — Four years ago, when it came to quality, Ford Motor Co.’s Kansas City assembly plant would not make anyone’s list of the best.

Today, that has changed dramatically.

By paying attention to detail and empowering workers, Ford has sharply improved the quality of models built at the plant, reduced production costs and raised customer satisfaction with the F-150 — Ford’s most profitable vehicle. The changes have generated $4.3 million in savings at the Kansas City plant in just 13 months.

Excellence is now measured in millimeters at the plant. The factory’s 5,800 workers exhibit an attitude far different from the cavalier atmosphere that prevailed during the 1990s.

The change is easily seen on the factory floor. Consider Shane Murphy. Under Ford’s quality enhancement program, he analyzed bumper installation on the plant’s F-150 pickup assembly line. Engineering specs allowed for an alignment variation of up to 7 millimeters when the left side is compared with the right — less than the length of a five-letter word on this page.

“The plant decided that wasn’t good enough for the customer,” Murphy said. So he and his co-workers refined the installation process to enhance and perfect bumper “symmetry.”

Bruce Bittle, chairman of the plant’s bargaining unit, said it wasn’t always like this. For most of Kansas City’s 51-year history, employees didn’t consider themselves stakeholders because there was no way for them to become agents of change.

Today, with the plant’s management focused on empowering employees, the automaker ranks Kansas City — which built 491,000 vehicles last year and will exceed 500,000 in 2004 — among its most reliable and high-quality plants.

It has accomplished the feat while building the most complex product mix for a Detroit automaker — a mission made simpler by Ford’s flexible manufacturing system that reduces model changeover costs by up to 15 percent.

Instead of retooling for new launches, Ford reprograms cells of robots to perform different operations.

In addition to Ford’s F-150 pickup — which is available in so many configurations, it is assembled 46 different ways — the Kansas City plant builds the Ford Escape and Mazda Tribute SUVs.

The turning point in the plant’s fortunes came with the implementation of the Ford Production System seven years ago. Based on strict process control and employee empowerment designed to foster steady improvement, the program was inspired by the Toyota Production System — which Ford executives point out was jump-started by Toyota executive Taiichi Ohno’s study of Henry Ford’s manufacturing philosophy.

“Around 2002, the plant started to click,” plant manager David Savchetz said.

On the Harbour scale, Kansas City ranks second among small SUV plants, taking 22.1 hours to build a vehicle; and fifth in the pickup segment, at 24 hours per unit.

Roman Krygier, head of manufacturing at Ford, forecasts similar scores for 2004 — a crowning achievement for the pickup line.

“We had some issues, maybe, regarding increased labor content,” Krygier said, referring to the new F-150. “But the team has done a tremendous job in terms of taking waste out of the system. We believe we’re pretty much going to come out where our old vehicle was. That’s outstanding.”


You can reach Eric Mayne at (313) 222-2443 or emayne@detnews.com.

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Only if it's Green.

A GM goal: 10% of Asian market by 2010
ASSOCIATED PRESS

November 17, 2006

Supachai Panitchpakdi, left, secretary general of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), speaks at the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)'s CEO summit in Hanoi today. Listening to him at right is Nick Reilly, vice president of General Motors Group. (APICHART WEERAWONG/Associated Press)

General Motors Corp., its market share shrinking at home, is turning to Asia to boost its profits, and aims to capture 10% of the region's market by 2010, the U.S. automaker's regional chief said 10%.

Top target markets are China and India, where rapid economic growth is fueling demand for cars, said Nick Reilly, president of GM Asia Pacific.

GM aims to sell 1.3 million vehicles in Asia this year to grab a 6.5% market share, two-thirds of which is expected to come from China, he said. Last year, GM's sales hit just over 1 million units in Asia for the first time, giving it a market share of 5.7%.

The company also plans to strengthen its presence in South Korea and Southeast Asia, especially Malaysia and Indonesia, Reilly told the Associated Press in an interview on the sidelines of a regional business forum here.

''We hope to increase our market share from 6.5% to nearer 10% over the next five years,'' said Reilly, who was appointed as GM vice president and put in charge of the Asia-Pacific market in July.

''We think that in 10 years' time, China market may well be the largest in the world, overtaking the U.S. ... so to win in Asia-Pacific, you really have to win in China,'' he said.

General Motors, beset by sluggish domestic sales and crippling legacy costs, needs China -- the world's third-largest auto market behind Japan and the United States -- to provide growth it won't find in the United States and other Western markets as it tries to engineer a comeback.

GM has poured money into China with plans to spend $3 billion in 2004-2007. Last year, GM surpassed German rival Volkswagen AG to become the No. 1 foreign automaker in China, which has become General Motor's biggest national market after the United States.

Reilly said GM, which has six joint-venture plants in China, would expand its product offering for the Chevrolet brand and grow its dealerships in China.

In India, where GM is still a minor player, he expects sales there to grow rapidly once its new plant becomes operational in 2008, raising annual production to 240,000 cars from 65,000 currently. There are no plans for a joint-venture in India as the company is confident its range of mini and small cars could help push sales, he said.

''We are now going into the mini-segment. These vehicles are absolutely right for the Indian market...at least for now, in this next phase of expansion in India which will take us to 240,000 cars by the end of 2008, we are doing 100-percent owned,'' he said.

In South Korea, he said GM is confident of growing its market share to ''the mid-teens'' from 11% currently. The company is also exploring ways to boost sales in Southeast Asia, especially in Malaysia which is the region's biggest passenger car market and Indonesia, he said.

''I think it's important it's seen not just as a China play. We want to make our growth evenly spread throughout the region because there are great opportunities,'' he added.

Reilly said the Asia-Pacific region currently contributes about a fifth of GM's global sales and is the ''biggest growth area for GM around the world.'' A strong presence in the region will help GM fend off competition from Japanese rival Toyota, which is racing to overtake GM as the world's largest automaker, he said.

GM now has production facilities in China, India, South Korea, India, Thailand and Australia.

''In Asia-Pacific, Toyota is well ahead of us because of its strength in Japan... but we have more than double our market share in the last 3 years, so we are certainly headed in the right direction. We've got good plans to keep it that way,'' he said.

''Globally, certainly our position in Asia Pacific will help us to compete with Toyota.''

Reilly said GM would seek to compete in price-sensitive segments in emerging markets where Toyota is very competitive.

''People are getting off bikes and scooters for the first time into a vehicle. We have not been very competitive in these emerging market segments. That has not been GM's traditional area but that will change....we will have entries in those price-sensitive segments,'' he said but did not give details.

He said Asia-Pacific is also emerging as an important production base for GM. Although GM now export cars mostly from its factories in Thailand and Korea, he said China and India are expected to emerge as new bases in the long run.

Copyright © 2006 Detroit Free Press Inc.

Alternative Transportation could be the answer.

Industry adds input on ignition locks
Automakers will discuss how to stop drunk drivers, but say technology won't hit the roads for years.

David Shepardson / Detroit News Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON -- Federal transportation officials endorsed the goal of installing ignition interlocks in all vehicles that would prevent intoxicated drivers from starting a car, but warned it would be at least a decade -- if not longer -- before the devices could be installed in large numbers.

Automakers agreed to take part in a blue-ribbon panel to discuss the technology, but offered a healthy dose of skepticism that one device could be installed fleetwide.

It often takes many years for an auto safety advancement to go from the discussion stage to the roads. Technical hurdles remain, and there are a number of competing technologies for measuring a driver's sobriety.

"There is no single solution that will eliminate drunk driving," said Fred Webber, president and CEO of the Alliance of Automotive Manufacturers, the trade group that represents General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co., DaimlerChrysler AG and Toyota Motor Corp., among others. "Any technology cannot hassle the sober driver. To be effective, the technology must be small, quick, noninvasive, accurate, reliable, fool-proof, durable and easy-to-maintain, and most importantly, it must be supported by the public."

Mothers Against Drunk Driving, which kicked off its self-described "audacious campaign to eliminate drunk driving" on Monday compared the ignition interlock devices to a polio vaccine.

"If we can't stop drunks from driving, we'll stop vehicles from driving drunks," said Glynn Birch, MADD's president who lost a 21-month-old son to a drunken driver.

Less than 0.5 percent of all trips are made by a driver impaired by alcohol, but those account for 39 percent of all traffic fatalities. About 150,000 people have been killed by drunken drivers in the past decade.

MADD officials noted that despite 1.4 million drunken driving arrests annually, just 100,000 interlock devices are on the roads. MADD wants that figure jump to 500,000 to 700,000 in five years.

Drunken driving arrests and alcohol-related deaths remain steady, as states in the past 20 years have steadily decreased the acceptable blood-alcohol limit from 0.15 percent to 0.08 percent.

A total of 45 states allow or mandate ignition interlocks for some repeat offenders. New Mexico is the only state that requires them for all repeat offenders. Some states require them for first-time offenders with high alcohol levels. Many judges allow offenders to plead to an offense that won't require the interlocks; others refuse to order their use.

Nicole Nason, head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, said it could be at least 15 years before ignition interlocks were a standard feature. In order to be accepted it would have to be "99.9 percent perfect," she said.

Early problems with air bags in the 1970s delayed their widespread use until the mid-1980s. A 1973 NHTSA requirement that forced manufacturers to build interlocks that wouldn't let drivers start vehicles unless they were wearing their seat belts provoked anger and was reversed by Congress a year later.

Sweden has asked the European Union for permission to make ignition interlocks required in all vehicles by 2012; both Ford's Volvo and GM's Saab are working on systems. Volvo's Alcolock will be offered as an option in 2009.

Ford spokesman Dan Jarvis said the company was interested in the technology.

"Parents might want it as an option if they had teenage drivers," he said.

You can reach David Shepardson at (202) 662 - 8735 or dshepardson@detnews.com.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Limited use


About 150,000 people have been killed by drunken drivers in the past decade.

There are 1.4 million drunken driving arrests made a year in the United States.

Only 100,000 vehicles on the road are equipped with interlock devices that prevent intoxicated drivers from starting the vehicle.
Source: Detroit News Research


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, November 20, 2006

High-Tech Defense Office Takes Lead On Telecommuting

By Stephen Barr
Monday, November 20, 2006; D01
Washington Post

The Defense Information Systems Agency describes itself as providing "global net-centric solutions" for the White House, the Pentagon and the armed forces.

In other words, it's the AOL, Google and OnStar for the Defense Department -- a crucial part of the government's national security operations.

Most of the engineers, computer scientists, telecommunication experts and technology wizards who work for DISA live in Northern Virginia and work in offices scattered through Arlington and Falls Church. Many are less than thrilled with the idea that by 2011 their jobs will be moved to Fort Meade, Md., as part of Defense Department base closures and realignments.

"A lot of those people want to stay with DISA but not uproot family because of schools and because of where their spouses work," said Jack Penkoske, DISA's director of manpower, personnel and security.

To keep from losing experienced employees, DISA has embraced telecommuting -- a way of working that the government has been slower to accept than the private sector.

Of the about 2,000 DISA jobs that have been identified as suitable for telecommuting, more than 500 employees have been cleared to work from home.

"I think our numbers for telework will continue to grow, as we get more people comfortable with it," Penkoske said in an interview last week. "We've had a seven-fold increase in the last 10 months, probably a little more than that."

About 4,400 people -- military, civil service and contractors -- work for DISA in Northern Virginia, and more than half are civil service employees. DISA hopes that telecommuting will entice the civil service employees -- all have at least a secret clearance -- to stick with the agency.

Prior to the 2005 base-closing announcement, DISA employees could work from home one day per pay period, or every two weeks. Once it became clear that the agency would be relocated to Maryland, DISA's director, Air Force Lt. Gen. Charles E. Croom Jr., put together a new policy that permits employees to work from home two days a week.

Now, DISA employees who qualify to telework and are on a compressed work schedule (80 hours biweekly in less than 10 days) can be out of the office five of 10 work days.

"There are probably going to be more [telework] days being offered as we move down the line," Penkoske said.

DISA picks up half the cost of installing and subscribing to broadband Internet service. Employees are allowed to work on only nonclassified material while at home. The agency has ramped up purchases of laptop computers so that equipment shortages will not slow the telecommuting program.

Penkoske said officials will be paying special attention to network security and to productivity measures to ensure that employees keep up with their workloads.

Theresa Noll, a senior telework program analyst at the General Services Administration, said research has found that telecommuting programs help agencies retain workers and maintain or improve their productivity.

In contrast, she noted, "it's widely recognized in all managerial circles that when you lose employees or significant parts of your workforce, there is a break in productivity."

Although DISA anticipates that telecommuting will help it keep employees, Penkoske said that telework should also aid in recruiting the next generation of workers, who, by most accounts, are keen on employers that offer flexible work arrangements.

The agency hires about 100 recent college graduates as interns each year and spends $60,000 to $70,000 over three years to train them, an investment that the agency is not eager to lose, Penkoske said.

Terry Holzheimer, director of economic development for Arlington County, said officials are looking to partner with the federal or state government to set up a telework center for DISA employees in Crystal City as they near their 2011 deadline for moving to Fort Meade, where the military plans to build a 1 million-square-foot building for DISA.

"It is one thing to lose the jobs. We don't really want to lose the people," Holzheimer said. "Taking that many people off the Metro and disrupting their lives and commuting patterns is not good public policy."

Setting up a telework center in Crystal City would provide a workplace for DISA employees on those days they do not have to be at Fort Meade or for days when they have meetings at the Pentagon, he said.

Penkoske said DISA is looking into providing daily buses "from different places" in Northern Virginia to Fort Meade so that employees can have a mass transit option for getting to work. DISA also will help employees sell and buy homes if they decide to relocate to Maryland, he said.

Unknown, of course, is how many DISA employees will move, how many will try telecommuting, and how many will quit and take jobs with other government agencies and contractors.

"My sense is that many will make that decision in 2008," Penkoske said.

Stephen Barr's e-mail address isbarrs@washpost.com.

Ford II optimistic about plan to revive Metro area

November 17, 2006

Robert Snell / The Detroit News

SOUTHFIELD -- Edsel Ford II knows there are shelves filled with failed plans to fix Metro Detroit.

His new initiative, "One D: Transforming Regional Detroit," won't add to the stack, he said.

In his first public comments since the initiative was announced earlier this week, the great-grandson of auto pioneer Henry Ford discussed One D during a Leaders Without Borders breakfast Thursday at the Westin Southfield.

By spring, a collaboration of public, private and nonprofit leaders will create a 25- or 30-point plan to improve the region, said Ford, 57, who sits on the board of Ford Motor Co. and who has been active with the Detroit Regional Chamber.

Here's a sampling of Ford's comments about the collaboration and his role:


On succeeding where others failed: "I realize I face some skeptics. Maybe some are saying 'Edsel, I've heard that speech before. It's another study.' Well, I think you're wrong. I have very high hopes.

"It revolves around a central principle that everyone gives up something for the larger goal or greater good. I challenge you to consider what you might be willing to set aside."


On why now, why this: "Economic or development challenges cannot be solved by independent jurisdictions working alone."


On how he came up with the idea after watching groups work independently: "We're never going to win under that scenario. I had a vision maybe we should start talking to each other."


On recognizing signs that the plan is working: "Hopefully we'll never know. It will just evolve."


On the importance of race relations: "The more we talk about it, and don't view it as the elephant in the room, the more we can work together and celebrate our diversity. It's one way to make Detroit a powerful region."

You can reach Robert Snell at (313) 222-2028 or rsnell@ detnews.com.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

One D, six partners
The six business and civic groups Edsel Ford II rallied to form One D: Transforming Regional Detroit are:


New Detroit; the Detroit Regional Chamber; the Detroit Metro Convention & Visitors Bureau; Detroit Renaissance; United Way for Southeastern Michigan; and the Cultural Alliance of Southeastern Michigan
Focus areas

Economic prosperity, educational preparedness, regional transit, race relations, regional cooperation and quality of life

Friday, November 17, 2006

The MOMS Room is out of here.

Thursday, November 16, 2006

Bold Marketing Plan to Attract New Customers?

Dear Ford:

I've been considering an Edge, but I understand there's a little problem.

Sincerely;
An Educated Consumer

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Bush can take steps to help auto industry



Detroit News November 14, 2006
Overbearing regulatory changes will cripple Big Three

Today's much anticipated meeting of the chief executives of the Big Three, President George W. Bush and some of his key advisers is good for Detroit and the American auto industry.

No definitive action will be taken today, but that's not the point. Detroit's automakers will remind the president that the auto industry not only is relevant to the nation's economy, it's also still one of the most important.

That factor has been overshadowed lately by the financial troubles that exist in the North American market for all three companies, Ford Motor Co., General Motors Corp. and the Chrysler Group. But the fact remains that the American auto industry still employs one in 10 people in the country and eight out of 10 auto jobs are held by people working for American auto companies.

That's why, in addition to the symbolism, this meeting is important.

Ford's Alan Mulally, GM's Rick Wagoner and Chrysler's Tom LaSorda are all entrenched in significant product and employee restructuring efforts. Billions of dollars in structural costs have been trimmed , and employees have made significant concessions, with more coming.

But there are areas where the president and Congress can -- and should -- step in and help without burdening the taxpayers. Chief among them is the manipulation of currency by Japan and China, primarily. Both countries unfairly control the value of their currency to give their automakers an advantage in the market.

While President Bush has urged the U.S. Treasury to pressure these countries, the progress has been too slow.

Additionally, the president needs to come out against the protectionist tariffs that are imposed on foreign corrosion-resistant steel. Revoking these tariffs, which hurt the automakers and other manufacturers, should be a priority when the U.S. International Trade Commission meets in December. Automakers say they spend an average of about $400 more on their products because of the tariffs.

Such extra costs add up, especially when combined with the legal fees the automakers pay protecting and defending themselves in regulatory matters. Here, too, the president can help. He must thwart some Democratic lawmakers' push to increase the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards, which have been a failure since their inception in 1975.

The auto industry is one of the most highly regulated in the world but is continually battling interference by special interest groups that want every car and truck to have zero emissions and be equipped with state-of-the-art technology, but still be affordable for everyone.

Finally, it is imperative that the president not give in to environmental activists who are pushing to have carbon dioxide classified as a pollutant by the Environmental Protection Agency. The automakers are building cleaner cars and trucks than ever and have done more to eliminate greenhouse gases from the atmosphere than any other industry.

These four areas are critical to the success of the American auto industry. None require new legislation or massive federal financial help. They require the president's commitment to maintaining an environment that lets the automakers be successful.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Big meeting

President Bush is scheduled to meet with the chief executives of the Big Three at 1:15 p.m. today.

Key issues include currency manipulation, health care, steel tariffs, environmental regulations

Other attendees include Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Al Hubbard, director of the National Economic Council.

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Bernd Pischetsrieder for CEO

MARK PHELAN BEHIND THE WHEEL: VW exec gets boot for talent

BY MARK PHELAN FREE PRESS COLUMNIST
November 12, 2006

QUESTION: How do you get fired at Volkswagen?

ANSWER: Improve the cars it builds and reduce what it costs to build them.

The giant German automaker hasn't said that's why it abruptly dismissed CEO Bernd Pischetsrieder last week, but VW hasn't said anything about the shocking move. All we have to go on is the dapper Bavarian's track record, which consists largely of prying concessions out of VW's powerful German unions and getting its model line back on the rails after previous management's costly detour down dead ends like the failed Phaeton luxury sedan.

Pischetsrieder did well enough that VW's board extended his contract through 2012 just five months ago. Since then, VW's sales and profits have risen steadily. Profits took a hit in the second quarter as VW works through a radical -- by German standards -- restructuring that includes 20,000 job cuts and working longer hours in exchange for job security.

Pischetsrieder and his handpicked lieutenant -- the dashing Wolfgang Bernhard, late of Mercedes-Benz and Chrysler -- had restored a semblance of sanity to VW.

With that résumé, don't be surprised if Wolfgang is the next one voted off the island. If that happens, he has options, including a return to Detroit.

Pischetsrieder and Bernhard are two of the smartest, most charismatic executives in the auto industry. The odds are people at DaimlerChrysler, Ford and GM are checking to see if there's a nice corner office available.

Bernhard, the VW brand chief, still has a job, but this isn't his first rodeo. He's been on the pointy end of Germany's bloodthirsty corporate politics before, when a combination of union enmity and executive infighting cost him the job he longed for: running Mercedes-Benz.

VW Chairman Ferdinand Piech allied himself with the company's union to oust Pischetsrieder, and Bernhard may again find himself on the wrong side of a power play. The union doesn't like the concessions Bernhard squeezed out of it, and Piech, who ran VW for nine years, seems to have a hard time retiring gracefully.

There's no shortage of companies that could use Pischetsrieder or Bernhard's talents. Fiat's CEO job just opened up. Ford could use a high-profile executive with unimpeachable credentials as a performance-oriented car guy. GM took a run at Bernhard once, and the job he might have had -- heir to Bob Lutz as gearhead-in-chief -- is open. DaimlerChrysler CEO Dieter Zetsche is a friend and fan of Bernhard's, so he might get another chance to run Mercedes, or even Chrysler, if problems in Auburn Hills get worse.

The auto industry employs countless people. Few can match Bernhard or Pischetsrieder's understanding of how to develop first-rate cars and build them profitably.

It's enough to get them hired just about anywhere. And apparently just what it takes to end up fired or on thin ice at VW.

Monday, November 13, 2006

Mulally's Job One: Global overhaul



CEO wants to use Toyota model to streamline Ford
Bryce G. Hoffman / The Detroit News

Ford Motor Co. President and CEO Alan Mulally said Friday that he plans to weld Ford's disparate regional divisions and brands into a single global operation capable of competing with the company he most admires in the world: Toyota Motor Corp.

Mulally, who joined Ford six weeks ago, delivered the message in an hour-long interview Friday with The Detroit News that covered the myriad challenges facing Ford today and his plan for reversing crippling financial losses that threaten the company's future.

The 61-year-old former Boeing Co. executive expressed optimism but did not sugarcoat Ford's problems or the need for a fundamental and far-reaching reorganization of the company.

"There's not one Ford. There's Ford of North America, there's Ford of South America, there's probably three Fords that make up Ford of Europe. There's Australia. There's China, India -- there's a lot of Fords, and they're operated very separately as business units," Mulally said. "We've got to go from where we are to leverage our global assets to compete as one company going forward."

And the clock is ticking. Mulally said the company must turn around its struggling North American operations by 2009 or risk running out of cash. To do that, he will need concessions from the United Auto Workers next year as he works to erase a $3,400 per vehicle cost disadvantage. Mulally said he is prepared to take his case directly to union workers if need be to get them on board.

Out of many comes one
While other executives have tried unsuccessfully to unravel the twisted strands of Ford's business structure, Mulally is confident he can hammer out a leaner, more transparent and focused company. In fact, if Ford was not so inefficient, he would be more worried.

"I look at that as nothing but opportunity," he said. "If you were a lean machine, doing a turnaround like this would be terrifying. But this is a very complex place, and there's a lot of opportunity to consolidate and simplify."

That means better integrating Ford's global operations and taking a hard look at its brand portfolio. He strongly hinted Ford would eventually appoint global product development and manufacturing czars.

"We are going to rationalize the brands, rationalize the product lines," he said.

Mulally also wants to find ways to build more cars and trucks off common platforms, sharing as many parts as possible while still giving consumers what they want. He pursued a similar strategy at Boeing, reducing the company's portfolio of more than a dozen airplanes to four.

Ford had already launched some initiatives in this direction, but Mulally wants to see these efforts increased and spread to all levels of the company -- starting at the top.

Ford has long been a balkanized company, plagued by infighting between different regions and business units. These turf wars have scuttled the best efforts of more than one Ford executive, but Mulally says he has found a way to cut through the ossified fiefdoms.

Every Thursday morning, he presides over a four-hour meeting with his senior staff. All of the company's divisions are represented, and each is required to give a frank assessment of their status and progress. He asks direct questions and expects clear answers. These meetings are a bully pulpit he uses to drive accountability and ensure cooperation and execution.

The Thursday meetings replace countless smaller meetings that took place every week in different parts of the company.

Mulally found Ford had no shortage of plans when he took over. There were marketing plans, manufacturing plans, sales plans and product plans. He is trying to merge them into a single overreaching plan that keeps everyone in the company on the same page.

Mulally said he does not blame Ford's employees for the company's woes. He holds management responsible. "I'm quite pleased with the talent I've found in almost every discipline," he said.

He is also quick to temper his often brutal assessments of Ford's problems and mistakes with compliments about the talent and dedication of his team.

The home front comes first
While he is thinking globally, Mulally made it clear that fixing Ford's North American automotive operations has to come first.

Ford continues to lose ground in the U.S. marketplace to foreign rivals. Over the past 12 months, its share of that market has dropped to 17.9 percent from 18.7 percent -- and that includes sales of its foreign nameplates like Volvo and Land Rover. The company's core Ford, Lincoln and Mercury brands account for only 16.8 percent of U.S. vehicle sales. A decade ago, these brands accounted for one out of every four cars and trucks sold in the United States.

Last month, Ford reported a $5.8 billion third-quarter loss, and more bad news is expected in the last three months of the year. Internal projections obtained by The News in September suggested the company could lose as much as $9 billion before taxes this year, though that figure now appears to be conservative.

In January, Ford announced a sweeping restructuring plan that aimed to idle 14 factories and eliminate 30,000 factory jobs and cut another 4,000 salaried positions by 2012. The plan was supposed to return Ford's North American automotive operations to profitability by 2008.

But Wall Street was unimpressed with Ford's timetable. Analysts demanded more immediate cuts, pointing out that rival General Motors Corp. had managed to convince 28,000 blue-collar workers to take buyouts between March and June. Meanwhile, gasoline prices were rising, and demand for Ford's profitable pickups and sport utility vehicles was falling fast. And increasingly desperate suppliers -- themselves reeling from rising raw materials costs -- were bucking Ford's efforts to get pricing concessions.

On Sept. 5, Bill Ford resigned as CEO and handed the company's reins to Mulally. An accelerated restructuring plan was unveiled 10 days later, with Mulally's tacit endorsement. But Ford insiders say the new CEO is already looking at additional cost-cutting moves.

"We have got to turn around North America and be profitable by 2009," he said. "Because if not, you just keep losing cash and pretty soon you run out."

Learning from the Japanese
Mulally intends to learn from Toyota's production system, which he called "the machine that changed the world."

"I'm a disciple of the Toyota production system," Mulally said, explaining that he became a student of the Japanese automaker while working as an engineer at Boeing and has traveled to Japan to study how Toyota's factories operate. "This system of continually improving the quality, putting the variations into the product line that people want and doing it with minimum resources and minimum time is absolutely where we have to go. If you look at Ford, it's the antithesis."

Analyst Kevin Reale with AMR Research said Toyota is not the only company Ford is lagging behind when it comes to global integration. GM has been pursuing a similar strategy and has a head start on Ford. What Mulally has going for him, Reale says, is experience.

"He's really going to turn Ford into a global company," Reale said. "I don't think he's going to take any prisoners."

As the head of Boeing's commercial aircraft decision, Mulally cut more than half the company's work force when its order book was decimated after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and went on to lead a successful counteroffensive against Europe's Airbus.

But even union leaders give Mulally grudging respect because of his honesty and candor. Now, he hopes to bring those same qualities to play in the 2007 contract negotiations with the UAW -- talks he said will be a "defining moment" for Detroit.

"It's all about competitiveness," he said. "You can't compete with a $3,400 disadvantage."

That is how much more it costs Ford to produce a vehicle than top foreign competitors, Mulally said, adding that a big chunk of that cost comes from wages and benefits.

UAW leader Ron Gettelfinger understands this math, Mulally said, but it may be tough for Gettelfinger to convince rank-and-file members to make the sacrifices necessary to make Ford competitive. Mulally said he respects the union, but will take his message to the workers if he has to.

"We are all in it together. I want the hearts and minds of all the participants," Mulally said. "We have to deal with reality."

That is exactly why Bill Ford hired Mulally, says turnaround expert John Hoffecker of AlixPartners. He said Bill Ford was smart to look outside the automotive industry. After all, Italy's Fiat SpA and France's PSA Peugeot Citroën were saved by executives from other industries.

"There's a strong realization at Ford that they need something significantly different," he said.

Finding the way back
Part of the reality Mulally is accepting is that many American consumers have turned their backs on Ford, and he said Ford has to convince them to give its cars and trucks a second chance. How? By building great vehicles like the Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan, which were just rated by Consumer Reports as two of the best new products from any automaker -- foreign or domestic.

"We are going to have to get people back in the dealerships to try Ford again," he said. "We have to show we are a viable alternative."

Ultimately, his job is to transform Ford from a big, failing company to a smaller one that has a chance to not only survive, but prosper.

"This is not new news that the automobile industry is shrinking," Mulally said. "It's been going on for four years. Nothing has changed. So we are at a defining moment. Are we going to embark on a transformation of the product line and the production system and create a viable company going forward?"

Thursday, November 09, 2006

Just a friendly reminder.

I'm not parking in the back of the lot.

Discrimination: The unequal treatment of persons, whether through hiring or employment rules or through variation of the conditions of employment, because of sex, age, marital status, race, creed, union membership, or other activities. In many cases discrimination is an unfair labour practice under federal or provincial laws.

Telecommuting shall set you free.

Monday, November 06, 2006

With telecommuting you regain